Trump Administration Challenges Birthright Citizenship Laws

Time to read:

1–2 minutes

The Trump Administration will ask the Supreme Court tomorrow whether children born to people in the country illegally or born to people on visas qualify as birthright citizens. The case appears to be yet another attack vector in the administration’s war on political opposition. 1

The case calls into question the court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment and related decisions going back to the 1898 case that made birthright citizenship a matter of U. S. law. The government is relying in part on doctrine that can be traced back to a former Confederate officer who argued before the Supreme Court in favor of legalized segregation.

Currently, 4.4 million children (under 18 years of age) live with at least one illegal immigrant parent. Additionally, some 250,000 children are born in the U.S annually would be excluded from birthright citizenship protections should the Court rule in favor of the Trump Administration. In other words, the gift the Supreme Court can deliver to conservatives is the reduction of 1 million Democrat voters each federal election cycle and the prevention of some percentage of another 4.4 million Democrat voters over the next 17 years. 2, 3

Conservatives at every level of politics have been steadily working to erode opposition to the current regime. Marc Elias’ Democracy Docket (not a sponsor, but I urge you to consider supporting their work) recounts court case after court case where his law firm is engaged in matters of voting law. Mail-in voting in particular has been under attack, because Democrats are known to favor this method of casting ballots (Conservatives, in contrast, tend to vote at the ballot box). Recently the U.S. Postal Service changed their rules about postmarking, which will impact when voters should mail in their ballots. In Texas in particular, the deep red state government has railed against “failing” federal border protection efforts — because they understand that naturalized citizens generally vote blue, and Texans with Latin American or Hispanic heritage already outnumber whites in the state. 4, 5

Featured image by MattWade – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5831566


  1. Jouvenal, J. (2026, March 30). Trump officials cite white supremacists in bid to end birthright citizenship. The Washington Post. Retrieved March 31, 2026, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/30/trump-birthright-citizenship-supreme-court-case/ ↩︎
  2. LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court considers constitutionality of Trump’s birthright citizenship order. (2026, March 30). [Video]. PBS News. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/listen-live-supreme-court-considers-constitutionality-of-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order ↩︎
  3. Chernikoff, S., & Padilla, R. (2025, June 27). Supreme Court birthright decision: How many people gain citizenship this way? USA Today. Retrieved March 31, 2026, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2025/06/27/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-decision-population-impact/ ↩︎
  4. Court cases. (2024, June 5). Democracy Docket. https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/ ↩︎
  5. Center, C. L. (2026, March 4). Here’s what the new USPS rule means for voting by mail. Campaign Legal Center. https://campaignlegal.org/update/heres-what-new-usps-rule-means-voting-mail ↩︎

Previous/Next

Leave a Reply

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation to On Current Events

Make a monthly donation to On Current Events

Make a yearly donation to On Current Events

Choose an amount

$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Thank you for your contribution!

Thank you for your contribution!

Thank you for your contribution!

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Discover more from On Current Events

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading