Plausible Deniability

Time to read:

1–2 minutes

By


The New York Times published an article titled, “House Rejects Measure to Bar Strikes Inside Venezuela.” The bill was submitted by House Democrats to reinforce congressional war powers. It was defeated on a basically party-line vote.

It’s like the GOP finds a somewhat plausible explanation and fights tooth-and-nail for it. Dems who likely know this campaign has nothing at all to do with narcotics trafficking get smeared for “not caring about our drug epidemic.” I’m sure if the topic was Nigeria, they’d be lambasted by especially evangelicals for not caring about Christianity.

Classic “So-when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife?” logic.

To be fair, it’s entirely possible the Dems have used exactly these tactics in the past to push through legislation they favored. What’s good for the goose, I guess.

One response to “Plausible Deniability”

  1. […] with most things with the GOP of late, there’s always some element of plausible deniability about their agenda. The EEOC can simply say “we’re investigating all claims from […]

Leave a Reply to That’s Not What “Equal Opportunity” Means – On Current EventsCancel reply

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation to On Current Events

Make a monthly donation to On Current Events

Make a yearly donation to On Current Events

Choose an amount

$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Thank you for your contribution!

Thank you for your contribution!

Thank you for your contribution!

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Discover more from On Current Events

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading