The Jimmy Dore Show brought up a really interesting matter, which I caught in a Facebook Reel. Now, I’m not super interested in all the Epstein conspiracy theories floating about, but this really got my attention. So, at the cost of contributing to the peripheral hysteria, here goes nothing:

The body the coroner examined may not have been Mr. Epstein’s.

Information claimed to have been found in the files strongly suggests Mr. Epstein had a procedure to remove his prostate. Herewith are the two images that were displayed, which I’ll label “A” and “B” for discussion later:

So if we accept that these two images are from the Epstein files, and that speaker Jeffrey is actually Mr. Epstein, then we accept that Mr. Epstein had a procedure to remove his prostate. Right?

Now, here’s the third image (“C”) produced on the show, which is claimed to be an excerpt from the autopsy conducted on Mr. Epstein:

If we accept that this image is page 6 of the autopsy conducted on Mr. Epstein, and that the NYC medical examiner was competent, then we must accept the examiner located a prostate in the body that was examined. ^{1, 2}

Pretty sure you can see where this is headed.

If we accept that the information contained within images A and B are fact, then the examiner should not have found a prostate within that body… suggesting the body was not Mr. Epstein’s.

1. McKinley, J. C., Jr. (2021, December 1). What is known about Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide. The New York Times. Retrieved March 3, 2026, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/01/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-suicide.html ↩︎
2. Speaking to the authenticity of image C, the document number in the upper left corner matches the document number found in the Epstein Archive, and that document number does correspond to the autopsy results. Although the document in the archive does not include Page 6, it does include mention of the condition of the body’s genitals, which matches the information also found on image C. See M-19-019432 – Epstein Archive. (n.d.). https://epstein-docs.github.io/document/m-19-019432/#full-text ↩︎